Citation coverage
Share of statements with a source reference that a reviewer has checked.
Knowledge / Literature & protocol memory
Review literature
and protocol changes
Keep papers, protocol revisions and the reasoning behind a decision connected. The researcher decides what belongs and what can be claimed.
Walk through the example ↓An illustrative scenario
An ecology team needs a shared record of the sources and protocol changes behind its next field season
01 / Supplied by your team
A question, with its source collection
- Research question
- Which protocol changes need a closer look before the next field season?
- Source collection
- Demo paper A, demo paper B and the team’s protocol notes, revision 3.
- Search boundaries
- An agreed topic, date range, source access and inclusion criteria.
02 / Automated preparation
An evidence queue, ready to inspect
- Source register
- Capture each source’s identifier, version and where it came from.
- Evidence cards
- Pair an extracted note with a source location; flag gaps or uncertain matches.
- Connected memory
- Build a searchable evidence wiki and a graph linking sources, notes and claims.
Ready for the researcher to review.
03 / A human decision
Does this source belong?
Sample exception
Demo paper B has an uncertain connection to the research question. Its inclusion stays unresolved until a researcher checks it.
For this illustration, the reviewer excludes demo paper B, keeps A and the protocol notes, and asks for the remaining citations to be checked.
This control demonstrates a sample decision. Nothing is sent or saved.
04 / A clear handoff
A traceable evidence brief
The sample review decision is still pending.
Sample decision applied
Keep A + protocol notes; exclude B; keep unresolved claims flagged.
- Evidence wiki
- Accepted notes linked to their source locations.
- Citation graph
- The relationship between sources, notes and proposed claims.
- Review trail
- Inclusion decisions, unresolved questions and corrections.
Apply the sample review decision to enable this download. Illustrative handoff contents. A real project needs an agreed scope and review.
Explore each stage. Decisions here only change this demonstration.
Source and claim decisions
- Source inclusion and exclusion
- Interpretation of evidence
- Claims and citation sign-off
What a first pilot would measure
Check citations and corrections
One bounded question, an agreed source collection and one reviewable evidence brief.
Correction rate
Factual or citation corrections per reviewed set of notes.
These are proposed evaluation criteria. No client results or performance gains are claimed.
Plan a literature workflow
Tell us how the task works today. We’ll agree the inputs, review steps, scope and price with you.